To Whom Do Rights Apply?

I believe that the concept of rights are born from intellectually "functioning" humans when gathered in a societal setting. Should rights be extended to those who observably have no comprehension of this concept, such as animals? If animals have no rights because they lack the ability to rationalize it, does that mean toddlers have no rights?

Though rights are a collective concept, each interpretation and manifestation of it varies for the individual. From this, I believe that rights have no absolute, objective, indisputable definition, much like any other word. While animals and toddlers themselves may have no concept of it, we attribute it to one or both because of morality, as the abstract human mind is deeply intertwined with other concepts and valuations. It's impossible to completely separate a single, undefiled thought. "Animals or children/animals and children have no rights because of their inability to comprehend it, but may be morally abhorrent to mistreat them" and "Animals and children have rights because of conceptual extensions" both seem plausible to me, though I mostly side with the latter.

What are your thoughts on the issue?

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RolePlayGateway/~3/8pMkzdIS67c/viewtopic.php

livan hernandez soledad o brien mega ball lottery winner lottery numbers mega millions lottery jackpot